MSL - Acid - DPF/Remap(CLK 320CDI) - Review/Feedback

[Parkgate]

At the crank, not the wheels! Is it an auto? What tyres do you run? And why does your map look like no other map ever published of a 3,0L CDI with that flat power band and gentle slope of torque? And no dyno tech worth their salt would ever mix crank torque (extrapolated) with rwhp. And as a bonus of your slightly iffy map you're stating that quoted torque is at the crank, how? Its not possible from a chassis dyno, especially if your rw torque figures are correct. Go figure.

 

[jenson1961]

sounds about right i'd say. i'd wonder if you could get away with saying it must have been done prior to me buying it .... honest guv! don't think i'll try it though

get it done right its its impossible to no

 

[Parkgate]

That makes as much sense as those power claims!!

 

[V6Matty]

get it done right its its impossible to no

Agree, lucky I don't have a dpf on this car , I'm sure my next car will. Do though,

 

[V6Matty]

At the crank, not the wheels! Is it an auto? What tyres do you run? And why does your map look like no other map ever published of a 3,0L CDI with that flat power band and gentle slope of torque? And no dyno tech worth their salt would ever mix crank torque (extrapolated) with rwhp. And as a bonus of your slightly iffy map you're stating that quoted torque is at the crank, how? Its not possible from a chassis dyno, especially if your rw torque figures are correct. Go figure.

I've had my car mapped by Acid and did have the dyno after and my run file wasn't massively different to the op's.there it's vey rare to get a perfect curve on the torque with an older car they tend to be a little peeky than on a newer car.

As for when they do the run there it's actually done in 4th gear rather than 5th as it provides a better result according to the manufacturer.

As said earlier in the thread, there is a calculation to work out crank power from wheel power ok there is a tiny chance of being a percent out either way but it's so tiny it's not worth worrying about. Plus every run will be slightly different. Put this car or even mine on that same dyno another day and the figures will change slightly.

As a side note my 270 now puts out the same power as a 320 after my remap, egr delete and cat removal with the benefited of on a run getting between a 3-5mpg increase.

May we ask are you a tuner or something yourself, it seems you have a bit of a bee in your bonnet about this, maybe it's just the way it's coming across but it does seem that way.

 

[ajuj12]

At the crank, not the wheels! Is it an auto? What tyres do you run? And why does your map look like no other map ever published of a 3,0L CDI with that flat power band and gentle slope of torque? And no dyno tech worth their salt would ever mix crank torque (extrapolated) with rwhp. And as a bonus of your slightly iffy map you're stating that quoted torque is at the crank, how? Its not possible from a chassis dyno, especially if your rw torque figures are correct. Go figure.

Dont shoot the messenger mate, i am not a technician. I just went there for the actual remap.

Its an AUTO and its running goodyear a2

From the feel of the car I know it has increased tremendously. I would wait for someone who knows to clarify the graph better. But please do let me know if someone things the graph has something wrong with it, i would rather go back and ask the tunner is something is off.

Other graphs i have seen do look very similar to what i have, so not really sure which graphs you are referring too.

Pic of a 320 cdi dyno

Pic of a e320 remap dyno

But once again I am just a user would like a tuner to comment on this!