joderest
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2018
- Messages
- 1,286
- Reaction score
- 813
- Your Mercedes
- ML270 2003
Sorry folks, bit bored so thought i would post this.
Mini F56 (3rd Gen). On Tuesday i changed the oil and filter, and also overhauled the brakes as lights were on stating needed pads changed. All done and now no service lights on. but heres the thing.
On the old R56 (GEN 2) owners would cut the sensor off, and solder the wires together to trick the ECU into thinking all was ok, this meant the brake pad light would not show up when pads were low, ( i used to change the pads on our old r56 before they hit the sensor, so never had to replace it)however, BMW changed the system on the new mini to a two stage sensor, so if first stage broken the sensor had to be changed to put the light out. I have seen lots of comments made by owners that this was a pain as you could not fool the ECU by twisting the wires together as it worked on resistance not on a break to the wire. However, i noticed that the sensor can be fitted "the wrong way round" which would mean it would never wear, hence never have to be replaced as would never touch the disc.
Why someone would want to do this to save £8 on a pad change is beyond me, its there for a reason, that reason to say you need to attend to your brakes soon.
I suppose some people just don't like lights and warning "bongs" on their cars.
Mini F56 (3rd Gen). On Tuesday i changed the oil and filter, and also overhauled the brakes as lights were on stating needed pads changed. All done and now no service lights on. but heres the thing.
On the old R56 (GEN 2) owners would cut the sensor off, and solder the wires together to trick the ECU into thinking all was ok, this meant the brake pad light would not show up when pads were low, ( i used to change the pads on our old r56 before they hit the sensor, so never had to replace it)however, BMW changed the system on the new mini to a two stage sensor, so if first stage broken the sensor had to be changed to put the light out. I have seen lots of comments made by owners that this was a pain as you could not fool the ECU by twisting the wires together as it worked on resistance not on a break to the wire. However, i noticed that the sensor can be fitted "the wrong way round" which would mean it would never wear, hence never have to be replaced as would never touch the disc.
Why someone would want to do this to save £8 on a pad change is beyond me, its there for a reason, that reason to say you need to attend to your brakes soon.
I suppose some people just don't like lights and warning "bongs" on their cars.