oigle
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Messages
- 3,473
- Reaction score
- 919
- Age
- 83
- Location
- Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia
- Website
- members.optusnet.com.au
- Your Mercedes
- 2003 ML270 sold but not forgotten. 2022 Kia EV6 RWD LR
I think the fact that there is an inline thermostat (Photo in previous post) means that the heat exchanger does both the warming up and cooling of the ATF. (Just as the lower part of the Radiator does).
If you think about it when the engine is cold then the thermostat is shut and so the warming coolant flows around the heat exchanger and warms the ATF.
(Remember the ATF is actually fed into this "heat exchanger")..
Once the engine is up to temp then the thermostat opens and allows the heat exchanger to be "cooled" to the correct running temp (I assume around 85C)..
In view of this I would ask a different question to yours...
With a "Heat exchanger" warming up and cooling down the ATF then couldnt we do without the half arsed split radiator design?
In other words couldnt the lower section of the Radiator that carries the ATF be bypassed by removing both ATF hoses and joining them together?
In a climate such as ours would this be such a problem?
As things stand we have 2 radiators that cool/warm the ATF..
I am all for simplicity of design and I cant help thinking that its overdone..
I never tow caravans and rarely thrash my car so I am fairly confident that I for one would be able to get away with such a mod..
Obviously people in hot climates that tow (Hi Mr Oigle) may not get away with this.
My gut instict is that the potentially troublesome lower Radiator could be dispensed with on this engine in this climate...
Just my thoughts..
Hi Simon - I think you could do that but the margin for cooling would be substantially reduced. Perhaps one would need the separate rad out front, hooked to the heat exchanger, if you want to remove the rad from the system - just for those long hill climbs etc.