AMGeed
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,299
- Reaction score
- 7,504
- Location
- Poole, Dorset
- Your Mercedes
- 1998/2001 W210 E280 x2 SOLD 2004 W211 E55 SOLD, 2014 E63 Biturbo SOLD .S204 C180K
Not specifically engine covers, more so the ones alongside each sill that can hide a multitude of problems if you were to take the covers off. But who bothers?
Last week I found I had a leak of brake fluid, noticeable under the front passenger door. Got it booked into my local workshop as he makes up his own brake pipes. I dropped it off this morning and got a call around 1pm to tell me that not only was there one brake pipe leaking, but on removing the covers, five other lines were in shocking condition and need replacing. Literally, the lines were almost rusted through. This will involve dropping the rear subframe and add a couple of days to completing the job.
It does prompt the question, isn't it time that removing these covers to properly inspect the condition of the brake pipes should be made part of the MOT test?
My tester always remarks as an advisory that engine covers are fitted, but what is the point of an MOT if possibly the most important item safety wise isn't properly looked at. I bought the car last Sept with a week old new MOT and the one advisory, a track rod end, replaced. No mention of corroding brake lines as they hadn't been inspected thoroughly.
I'm going to make a point of paying my MOT tester extra to remove the covers and check the brake lines every MOT in future purchases. It could mean the difference between peace of mind or brakes possibly failing with the family onboard.
Last week I found I had a leak of brake fluid, noticeable under the front passenger door. Got it booked into my local workshop as he makes up his own brake pipes. I dropped it off this morning and got a call around 1pm to tell me that not only was there one brake pipe leaking, but on removing the covers, five other lines were in shocking condition and need replacing. Literally, the lines were almost rusted through. This will involve dropping the rear subframe and add a couple of days to completing the job.
It does prompt the question, isn't it time that removing these covers to properly inspect the condition of the brake pipes should be made part of the MOT test?
My tester always remarks as an advisory that engine covers are fitted, but what is the point of an MOT if possibly the most important item safety wise isn't properly looked at. I bought the car last Sept with a week old new MOT and the one advisory, a track rod end, replaced. No mention of corroding brake lines as they hadn't been inspected thoroughly.
I'm going to make a point of paying my MOT tester extra to remove the covers and check the brake lines every MOT in future purchases. It could mean the difference between peace of mind or brakes possibly failing with the family onboard.