mercmadjim
Senior Member
Well I for one say well done Robertjrt, for fighting your corner, and I wish you luck sir...
Photographic evidence. I have had results when "nicked" for disobeying illogical signage at the cross roads of Putney High Street and the South Circular, and on a separate occasion beat a parking ticket where the signage was deficient (different rules on either side of the road, but no signs on my side to make that clear).
In both cases, photographs spoke for themselves and I was "severely let off" and advised not to do it again. The signage subsequently improved on each venue!
I thought he required our sympathy, but perhaps a macroprolactinoma is milking it a bit?
On a second point, as a member of the medical fraternity, let me assure you, if I ever tried to kill someone, they would not be writing about on a Forum.
now, did I put that writ?
In this case MB should have done more at the early stage and reported back. One could also sum up the customer, and reason is, or was he capable of trying to jump start the car or not, in this case I do not think that he was able to do this, for a start the car was under a guarantee, just because the car did not start it did not mean that jump starting would help, there are so many reasons as to why a car will not start
Thanks for explaining that Robert, it now makes sense that the car was not in you possession when the damage was done. With electronics, it either works or it does not, in the case of a reverse current flow the death of the components is instant and non reversible.
At least you were lying in probably the cleenest part of the hospital
All MB have to do is to give me my money back and I will go away, its that simple!
Isn't that rather misleading? Aren't you asking them to give you what the car was worth 4 years ago?
Mercedes senior people have to decide what to do when faced with an owner who says he didn't do it; a dealer who says their staff didn't do it; and Mondial who says their staff didn't do it. Even the wisdom of Solomon couldn't solve this one even if the parties litigate for two hundred years.
Isn't that rather misleading? Aren't you asking them to give you what the car was worth 4 years ago?
We don't have to find Soloman or wait two hundred years, Mrs Justice Hallon decided who was at fault without any difficulty at all. Indeed she is reported as being bemused by why the case was before her.Not as bemused as I was! My solicitor and Barrister both expressed surprise that MB went to trial, we had all expected MB to "settle on the Court steps".
Yet here we are 8 months later still issuing Court actions against Mercedes-Benz.
Oh dear, one of use will have to address the ending of this dispute, it will not be me of course, I am getting the hang of filling in these Claim forms. I will next try a few N244's, a request for an Injunction or two.
I did inform MB that when my cheque had cleared for my part of the Costs it would finance further legal action against them.
I keep writing to MB and MB keep ignoring what I write and then when I do do what I say I will do, MB seem peeved. I wonder why?
If you tell the truth it saves the bother of remembering the lies.
I see you posted elsewhere: -
Does look as though litigation is becoming almost a hobby?