I've been into kit cars for a while now and can't help but notice that traditional roadster manufacturers are bemoaning the lack of rear wheel drive donors(ienly Sierras,B*Ws and Jags).Why are they overlooking the 190/124 series of Mercs?
It seems to me that a good 190 2 litre motor puts out about 135bhp as standard with scope for more yet the 2.0 Pinto needs a bit of tuning to get to 135bhp. The 190 also has decent independent rear suspension. I for one would rather use a 190 as a kit donor than a Sierra. Is there some technical/financial reason that kit makers won't entertain the 190 or 124? The range of engines is good as well 1.8/2.0 fours and the 2.6 six in the 190 and the 2.0/2.3 fours,2.6/2.8/3.0/3.2 sixes from the 124. The sixes maybe not suited to the likes of the 'Lotus 7' type of kit car,but 40's/50's style roadsters would be great to drive fitted with the Merc six and autobox. Not to mention the massive reduction in weight compared to a 6 cylinder 124.
Give an old Merc a new lease of life maybe? What do you all think?
Cheers
Ian
It seems to me that a good 190 2 litre motor puts out about 135bhp as standard with scope for more yet the 2.0 Pinto needs a bit of tuning to get to 135bhp. The 190 also has decent independent rear suspension. I for one would rather use a 190 as a kit donor than a Sierra. Is there some technical/financial reason that kit makers won't entertain the 190 or 124? The range of engines is good as well 1.8/2.0 fours and the 2.6 six in the 190 and the 2.0/2.3 fours,2.6/2.8/3.0/3.2 sixes from the 124. The sixes maybe not suited to the likes of the 'Lotus 7' type of kit car,but 40's/50's style roadsters would be great to drive fitted with the Merc six and autobox. Not to mention the massive reduction in weight compared to a 6 cylinder 124.
Give an old Merc a new lease of life maybe? What do you all think?
Cheers
Ian