davemercedes
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2012
- Messages
- 4,345
- Reaction score
- 2,099
- Location
- Glos
- Your Mercedes
- 2007 Merc 220 CDi Est Auto Av (s203)
Voting should be fully traceable. One has a polling card, one is on the electoral roll in a given district; one's voting slip is numbered and that number is recorded against one's name. Cross referencing those records against the NI numbers recorded should bring out any double counts...
...to mean anything).
But how traceable? One thing that has always worried me is the level to which the vote is truly secret. As Craig highlighted, when I check in to vote at the polling station, they write my electoral number on the back of my voting paper. The papers are supposed to be sealed and end up in a warehouse at Hayes, Middlesex where they are supposedly held for "a year and a day" so that alleged/possible fraud could be investigated:
https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-1051,00.html
So who has access to the voting papers after the election? The article above confirms that anyone having access to those documents can speedily trace the name and address of every voter for such candidates if they wish. So if an "evil dictator" took power, his/her new "Stazi" could presumably (maybe under cover of a claimed and much publicised fraud check the papers) and in doing so trace the voting sheet back to each individual voter. They might need some computer power to do it but given that our current PM had no problem shoveling out a £1Bn "bung" I don't think that would be too big a problem and those who voted against the dictator now in power might expect a visit from some rather nasty people.
- I think that's probably more worrying than an alleged and unspecified number of duplicate votes.