auto or manual

television

Always remembered RIP
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
164,073
Reaction score
368
Age
89
Location
Daventry
Your Mercedes
2002 SL500, 216 CL500, all fully loaded
With 16 speed manual, would you also need a manual? :confused::confused::confused:

Possibly :rolleyes: but think of the fun you could have just pushing that left leg up and down some 32 times per mile
 

rovingHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
214
Reaction score
0
Location
Tamworth
Your Mercedes
SLK230K, Mondeo Estate, Blackbird
You either love 'em or hate 'em.......
I disagree- a Maybach is probably better with auto, I prefer my SLK with manual. It's possible to like both but have a preference depending on circumstances.

RH
 

whitenemesis

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
17,978
Reaction score
40
Your Mercedes
CLS55 AMG '05
I disagree- a Maybach is probably better with auto, I prefer my SLK with manual. It's possible to like both but have a preference depending on circumstances.

RH

I agree 100% ;)
 

stevieb15

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Location
West Sussex
Your Mercedes
98 r129 sl500,90 W126 500SE,03 CLK 320 Avant Convertible
Why would anyone choose manual over auto if given the choice?
Sooner or later governments world wide will grasp the nettle and get rid of manual options because an auto box is just so much safer.
Always in the correct gear and no need to take one hand of the wheel and depress clutch whilst moving lever to engage correct (often incorrect) ratio
 

roadhog

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
1,616
Reaction score
2
Location
Sunny Norfolk
Your Mercedes
W124 300D x2, C124 300
Why would anyone choose manual over auto if given the choice?
Sooner or later governments world wide will grasp the nettle and get rid of manual options because an auto box is just so much safer.
Always in the correct gear and no need to take one hand of the wheel and depress clutch whilst moving lever to engage correct (often incorrect) ratio

They wouldn't do that, they'd have the wrath of PumaPete to deal with. :D
 

rovingHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
214
Reaction score
0
Location
Tamworth
Your Mercedes
SLK230K, Mondeo Estate, Blackbird
no need to take one hand of the wheel and depress clutch
You obviously don't drive many manuals, do you? The clutch is foot-operated. It's spelt 'off', btw.

More seriously, I don't feel as in control with an auto and I feel that auto encourages a lazy attitude where the driver doesn't pay enough attention to the road. Others' attitude to it might be different.

You're right, though- let's ban manuals as you & others don't like them.

RH
 

stevieb15

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Location
West Sussex
Your Mercedes
98 r129 sl500,90 W126 500SE,03 CLK 320 Avant Convertible
Didn't comment on like/dislike
 

Thincat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
Your Mercedes
2001 SLK320
Why would anyone choose manual over auto if given the choice?
Sooner or later governments world wide will grasp the nettle and get rid of manual options because an auto box is just so much safer.
Always in the correct gear and no need to take one hand of the wheel and depress clutch whilst moving lever to engage correct (often incorrect) ratio

In general I think the less governments interfere with things the better. They usually make things worse.

If automatics were always in the correct gear they would be OK, but they're not - especially the torque converters. AMG have tried to speed them up but they're still annoying to use when you're pressing on. The new double clutch semi-autos are getting there, though, and I'd certainly like that option in my next car.

I don't think automatics are safer. It's much easier for stupid people to make a complete b*ll*cks of it in an auto, when a manual would just stall. I wonder how many garage walls have been demolished by autos, or people run over unintentionally.
 

television

Always remembered RIP
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
164,073
Reaction score
368
Age
89
Location
Daventry
Your Mercedes
2002 SL500, 216 CL500, all fully loaded
In general I think the less governments interfere with things the better. They usually make things worse.

If automatics were always in the correct gear they would be OK, but they're not - especially the torque converters. AMG have tried to speed them up but they're still annoying to use when you're pressing on. The new double clutch semi-autos are getting there, though, and I'd certainly like that option in my next car.

I don't think automatics are safer. It's much easier for stupid people to make a complete b*ll*cks of it in an auto, when a manual would just stall. I wonder how many garage walls have been demolished by autos, or people run over unintentionally.

The answer is just as many people that start up a manual in gear
 

nicko44

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Your Mercedes
W205 C200 Sport Estate
Why would anyone choose manual over auto if given the choice?
Sooner or later governments world wide will grasp the nettle and get rid of manual options because an auto box is just so much safer.
Always in the correct gear and no need to take one hand of the wheel and depress clutch whilst moving lever to engage correct (often incorrect) ratio

I'm not generally in favour of banning things, but whilst we are on this subject of auto versus manual, I think an equally good case could be made for banning automatics:
They are more expensive to buy, they consume more resources and energy to manufacture, they almost always use more fuel, they almost always result in higher CO2 emissions, they cost more to put right when they go wrong, they lead to lazy driving techniques, they are harder to park smoothly when inching backwards and forwards into small spaces, and they occasionally result in older drivers suddenly shooting backwards over the edge of beach front parades. And lastly, they are NOT always in the correct gear, unlike a manual, where a driver has to consciously decide which gear he or she should be in.

And if a driver cannot do this, then it is the driver who should be banned, not the type of transmission.

I have an auto car and a manual car, and I love both. If I never had to cope with the M25 or the North Circular, I would plump for manual, since it is ultimately a more satisfying drive. But given today's traffic conditions, I am delighted to have an auto as well.
Nick
 

rovingHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
214
Reaction score
0
Location
Tamworth
Your Mercedes
SLK230K, Mondeo Estate, Blackbird
In general I think the less governments interfere with things the better.
Thomas Jefferson & Ronnie Reagan had a lot of amusing quotes on the subject.

If automatics were always in the correct gear they would be OK, but they're not - especially the torque converters.
Would you please stop bringing facts into it? This is about how autos are good, manuals are bad. We need trite & simplistic, not factual & considered.

RH
 

stevieb15

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Location
West Sussex
Your Mercedes
98 r129 sl500,90 W126 500SE,03 CLK 320 Avant Convertible
Thomas Jefferson & Ronnie Reagan had a lot of amusing quotes on the subject.

Would you please stop bringing facts into it? This is about how autos are good, manuals are bad. We need trite & simplistic, not factual & considered.

RH
I hadn't realised this was a subject that would make people so irrationally defensive.
 

Michael G 2

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
8
Age
31
Location
Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire
Your Mercedes
Nowt yet...
I'm not generally in favour of banning things, but whilst we are on this subject of auto versus manual, I think an equally good case could be made for banning automatics:
They are more expensive to buy, they consume more resources and energy to manufacture, they almost always use more fuel, they almost always result in higher CO2 emissions, they cost more to put right when they go wrong, they lead to lazy driving techniques, they are harder to park smoothly when inching backwards and forwards into small spaces, and they occasionally result in older drivers suddenly shooting backwards over the edge of beach front parades. And lastly, they are NOT always in the correct gear, unlike a manual, where a driver has to consciously decide which gear he or she should be in.

And if a driver cannot do this, then it is the driver who should be banned, not the type of transmission.

I have an auto car and a manual car, and I love both. If I never had to cope with the M25 or the North Circular, I would plump for manual, since it is ultimately a more satisfying drive. But given today's traffic conditions, I am delighted to have an auto as well.
Nick

No, they shouldn't be banned or how will people like me with disabilities get around? I can't use a manual and if I could I'd soon be in an auto.
Not strictly true, the new 8 speed 'box in the new 5 series has BETTER fuel and C02 figures than the manual.
RH stop getting so defensive, we are only asking the OP to try a manual and not completely disregard the auto.
I remember you saying that you tried both.
 

rovingHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
214
Reaction score
0
Location
Tamworth
Your Mercedes
SLK230K, Mondeo Estate, Blackbird
I hadn't realised this was a subject that would make people so irrationally defensive.
You choose what you like, leave me in peace to choose what I like; what's irrational about that?

Banning something that millions use without problem is irrational, surely?

Michael- I totally accept your need for an auto; my objection is to those who wish to dictate what others should use based on their own needs/circumstances/tastes. I disagree with you telling folks what's better on the grounds that you've driven neither.
Autos are not necessarily better. Manuals are not necessarily better. If a few people around here would accept that concept I'd have a lot more respect for them.

RH
 

davidsl500

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Messages
6,836
Reaction score
4,179
Age
122
Location
Home : Derbyshire at the moment !
Your Mercedes
R172 250CDI Gone..!, R129 SL500 Gone...
Well the auto verses manual debate will go on for as long as they are both available. I like both but wouldn’t consider a manual box for my Mercedes in the same way that I wouldn’t choose an auto box for my late lamented Lotus 7 or any of the other “point and squirt” cars I have owned over the years.

I do know that the auto is a pleasure in stop-start traffic queues and round the towns whereas a manual is less so. With respect to auto’s not always being in the right gear – its very rare and more usually down to the driver not “being in the right gear” than the car !

The other advantage of an auto is that, at the traffic light grand prix, you can wave goodbye to the other guy as you plant your foot whilst they struggle to find some gears……. :)

 

television

Always remembered RIP
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
164,073
Reaction score
368
Age
89
Location
Daventry
Your Mercedes
2002 SL500, 216 CL500, all fully loaded
You choose what you like, leave me in peace to choose what I like; what's irrational about that?

Banning something that millions use without problem is irrational, surely?

Michael- I totally accept your need for an auto; my objection is to those who wish to dictate what others should use based on their own needs/circumstances/tastes. I disagree with you telling folks what's better on the grounds that you've driven neither.
Autos are not necessarily better. Manuals are not necessarily better. If a few people around here would accept that concept I'd have a lot more respect for them.

RH

The facts stated by Micheal G 2 are correct, and he does not need to drive one to say what he did, the resale value dictates the difference on the secondhand market of what MB buyers want
 

Peter Best Insurance is a leading specialist in Mercedes-Benz insurance. All MBO members are eligible for exclusive rates on all our classic car policies.
Call now for our 'BEST' quote. Tel: 01376 573033
Top Bottom