.....
I've had mine since it was a demonstrator 8 years ago. So, 9 years old, 154,000 miles and I still thoroughly enjoy driving it. Still hasn't missed a beat, developed any annoying squeaks and rattles, has never broken down and when I feel the hooligan in me come to the fore, can still easily harass anything in the outside lane or barrel up lanes at an alarming rate. .....
Bomb proof engines, gearboxes and very robust build quality is what buyers want. Merc wants to sell us the same thing again and again.
Maybe the rusting issue is Mercs way of selling us the same thing again and again.
The mechanicals go on for decades (or use to in the 80's & 90's), so by making them rust, it might encourage owners to buy a new one every five years.
I'd rather just buy a Merc and run it for 30 years. I hate having to keep on buying the same thing again and again.
Merc needs new car sales, not people like me buying ten year old models and running them for another ten years+.
IMO, the W202 was the last over engineered Merc, but Merc knew that they had to sell more cars, so skimped on the rustproofing.
If a W202 didn't rust, what reason would anyone have to sell it, as they go on for decades. Bomb proof engines, gearboxes and very robust build quality is what buyers want. Merc wants to sell us the same thing again and again.
Unfortunately the W203 wasn't as good so why bother buying it??
My 178000 miles 1999 3.0 Omega would give you a run for its money too.
As for the competition, Golf was a byword for reliability but everyone I know with one has had trouble with them. most recently a friend has binned his 55 plater with less than 100k on it. Kept letting him down, so he's bought ... a 2012 E220cdi Estate instead.
Other friends seem to forever be replacing their VW turbos.
In the mid nineties an E Class was the same price as a 2 bed terrace in the right area of Norwich, which is where I was living, those houses are now £170,000 and up.
It was a premium car because it was a very premium price, if it was still inline with those prices it would be classed as a premium product, 1 because of the price and 2 because none would be around as no twat would buy one.
Mercedes is no longer a proper premium brand
Who said so? Still my premium brand as far as the average car that drives on UK roads is concerned! Now, when things get out of place is when you equate it to Aston Martin, Ferrari, Lambo and the likes, then will I say that Mercedes is not a proper premium brand.
NB: I excluded Bentley from the range because they are manufactured by VAG group which is not on a par with Mercedes.
I tried a Bentley 2 weeks back and too large for my garage, plus the repair bills were too large for my wallet
When my W123 was new (1985) it cost £10k, a great deal more than mainstream manufacturer's equivalent models and as in those days cheap and easy finance was not available Tom, Dick or Harry couldn't afford to get behind the wheel of a Mercedes. 30 years ago Mercedes cars were reserved for the well off and priveleged of our society.
Not today. With FWD base models on offer, cheap finance and mass production and sales, there is nothing special about a new Mercedes (unless it's a high spec SL, S, etc). Have you seen the sort of people that drive around in new C and E Classes? Common folk!
The same goes for AMG. 30 years ago an AMG car was special. Today you can order a C180 adorned with AMG wheels, styling, badges, etc. I had an "AMG" Coupe C-Class last year, a 220CDi and the only thing AMG about it was the badges.
Modern Mercs are no longer premium products. They don't stand out from their competitors like they use to, they rust, they break down and I wouldn't buy one. In late 2011 I bought a new BMW 520d Touring and haven't looked back,
Rant over!