Which SL should I buy ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tedski

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi

Just got the money to afford my dream car MB SL

I want to pay less than £20K

Looking for something like a 1996 SL280 but not sure

Is there much difference pre/post 1996 ?

Is a 320 better than a 280 ?

Is 80,000 miles on a 96 SL280 FMBSH worth buying ?

Any advice greatly appreciated

Thanks

Tedski
 

plink49

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Location
Rio Rancho, New Mexico, USA
I'm not sure exactly which models you are referring to, but I do know that pre-merger (with Chrysler) cars are far preferable to post merger ones. The merger was in 1998. So...keep that in mind. Problem areas/quality control seem to have suffered in MB cars following the merger. Have been advised by others that pre-1998 is the way to go! I have a '96 and '92 ('86 as well, trying to sell) and couldn't be happier!
 

pentoman

Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
Down and Left-a-bit, England
Website
www.pentoman.com
Have a look at this:

http://www.mercedes-seite.de/mercedes/pkw/index.html

to help you make your decisions based on available models.

The 320 (M104) 24 valve straight-six engine is preferable to the 300 (M103) and 300-24v (M104) engined models. I would suggest to the Mercedes enthusiast they're preferable to the later (post '98 ) 320 and 280 V6's too, even if less modern and probably less fuel efficient.
V8's are nice.
V12's expensive to run, but still nice.


Russ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


GAD was founded in 2009 where we developed bespoke ECU Remapping software for motorsport clients, moving forward, we have extended to road vehicles for both performance and economy,
contact GAD Tuninghttp://www.GADTuning.co.ukto discuss your requirements.
Top Bottom