turbopete
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 14,209
- Reaction score
- 331
- Age
- 48
- Location
- Spennymoor
- Your Mercedes
- 2017 '17' Ford Mondeo 2.0TDCi ST Line X 180 (sorry)
as daft as the OPs suggestion maty seem on the surface, i can see SOME logic in it.
EOBD (or OBDII for those not in europe) was supposed to standardise all codes for engines as a minimum. so that SHOULD mean that any code that STAR can pull, can be pulled my a generic £20 ebay code reader and it SHOULD be the same fault. except that we know the codes are NOT always interpreted correctly by the cheapo scanner (as the manufacturers play the rules to their advantage to get you back to their workshop theoretically)
the other rip-off as far as diagnostics goes is the sheer cost of some of the systems and, of course now, the reliance to be 'connected' to the manufacturer via the internet.
now ignoring cars for a moment that have to be coded online (newer MBs for example), the last i heard, a genuine STAR set-up cost something like £11k + subscription.
given the fact that something like a Delphi DS150E or similar, even genuine can be bought from online retailers (official outlets) for less than 1/3rd the price of star and have pretty much the same functionality according to the sales info (they can code injectors etc which at the time i looked was pretty much a STAR only job)
then theres the cost of the machines anyhow. I know that theres varying qualities of kit out there, but if you can get STAR equipment made and sent to you from ebay or china etc for £400 or less, how do MB justify £11k ffor something little or no different and probably even made in the same factory? THESE are where i feel the genuine rip-offs are.
would i pay £30 for codes to be read? probably if i needed to. would i pay MBs rate? (£68 for half hour min charge when i had the 210) not a chance.
EOBD (or OBDII for those not in europe) was supposed to standardise all codes for engines as a minimum. so that SHOULD mean that any code that STAR can pull, can be pulled my a generic £20 ebay code reader and it SHOULD be the same fault. except that we know the codes are NOT always interpreted correctly by the cheapo scanner (as the manufacturers play the rules to their advantage to get you back to their workshop theoretically)
the other rip-off as far as diagnostics goes is the sheer cost of some of the systems and, of course now, the reliance to be 'connected' to the manufacturer via the internet.
now ignoring cars for a moment that have to be coded online (newer MBs for example), the last i heard, a genuine STAR set-up cost something like £11k + subscription.
given the fact that something like a Delphi DS150E or similar, even genuine can be bought from online retailers (official outlets) for less than 1/3rd the price of star and have pretty much the same functionality according to the sales info (they can code injectors etc which at the time i looked was pretty much a STAR only job)
then theres the cost of the machines anyhow. I know that theres varying qualities of kit out there, but if you can get STAR equipment made and sent to you from ebay or china etc for £400 or less, how do MB justify £11k ffor something little or no different and probably even made in the same factory? THESE are where i feel the genuine rip-offs are.
would i pay £30 for codes to be read? probably if i needed to. would i pay MBs rate? (£68 for half hour min charge when i had the 210) not a chance.