Rob77
New Member
I'm considering giving up the company Mondeo. The amount of miles I'll be doing, I'm looking at something like a 92 to 99 C or E class (still doing the figures cos I'd be giving up free fuel too - I know!!). The 250 or 220TD C class would be ideal but they still tend to be pricey so I was thinking about either a C or E 250D or maybe an E 300D (I'm assuming the 220D would be annoyingly slow?).
My driving'll be minimum 600mls/wk (maybe far more), mostly on motorways. My first worry's on driving pleasure/performance and to give a comparison, I can live with a 2.0 Mondeo for speed and handling (not comfy though) but my last 1.9TD Volvo V40 was slow and handled like a boat (but sure it was comfy). How would a C or E compare?
The C's don't change much over this period but E's get the bug eye version on later models, is that better than the older one?
On ecconomy, again I'm leaning to the 250 (and C) as the 300 seems quite a bit thirstier. But is it a better drive? There are certainly quite a few reasonably priced 300's about so I'm tempted.
Another thing is; is it generally thought better to go for a low mileage older car or a newer high miler?
I'm ok on the other bits, auto, cruise, etc and I'm not concerned too much about resale value as I'd be pricing the thing on the basis it's a ruin after 3 years (if it's still going strong then it'd be a bonus).
Sorry if this seems like a jumble of random thoughts, on what are really very subjective isses. I suppose I'm trying to get a feel for the experience and with no "first hand" but just going on research so far, I'd list my likely buy in the order of C250D, E250D then E300D.
Oh, lastly do you find MB's attract much unwanted attention? Mine would be parked on the street and though my company ones have never been troubled, is it likely a MB would be any more of a focus for nutters?
My driving'll be minimum 600mls/wk (maybe far more), mostly on motorways. My first worry's on driving pleasure/performance and to give a comparison, I can live with a 2.0 Mondeo for speed and handling (not comfy though) but my last 1.9TD Volvo V40 was slow and handled like a boat (but sure it was comfy). How would a C or E compare?
The C's don't change much over this period but E's get the bug eye version on later models, is that better than the older one?
On ecconomy, again I'm leaning to the 250 (and C) as the 300 seems quite a bit thirstier. But is it a better drive? There are certainly quite a few reasonably priced 300's about so I'm tempted.
Another thing is; is it generally thought better to go for a low mileage older car or a newer high miler?
I'm ok on the other bits, auto, cruise, etc and I'm not concerned too much about resale value as I'd be pricing the thing on the basis it's a ruin after 3 years (if it's still going strong then it'd be a bonus).
Sorry if this seems like a jumble of random thoughts, on what are really very subjective isses. I suppose I'm trying to get a feel for the experience and with no "first hand" but just going on research so far, I'd list my likely buy in the order of C250D, E250D then E300D.
Oh, lastly do you find MB's attract much unwanted attention? Mine would be parked on the street and though my company ones have never been troubled, is it likely a MB would be any more of a focus for nutters?