A late 202 will give less trouble than an early 203 I would guess although a 203 is more modern (higher safety by quite a margin). A late 202 is probably a better bet for piece of mind motoring.
In either car a 180 will not be great, especially in a 202 where there is no SC. If it were a 202 I'd go looking for a 200, 240 or 280 all of which can he had cheaply.
Hello Graham, and welcome to the forum. A late 202 with that mileage should be virtually unused. If it has a full service history, it will be particularly good generally, and especially because the model and year were prone to rust. With FMBSH any rust should be addressed by MB foc, and without quibble in my experience.
Other than rust, it almost hasn't done enough miles for anything to go wrong yet!
Stop looking for the Best Garage!! We are here
and have the best advanced solutions for you,
at Competitive prices.
Put us to test with any issue you may have.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.