Splatt
Senior Member
MB do not seem to have gone this route yet but I wonder if they will ? I have been looking to buy a car, the television ad for which depicts the designer chap beating himself up for the want of competition What has grabbed my attention is that they do an engine which they call Double charger, a supercharger at the front to blow combustion charge in and a turbocharger on the back to suck spent gas out. The net result of this together with a lot more injection and combustion technology which is beyond me is to achieve a 1.4 petrol nugget producing 170 PS (168bhp) and a petrol consumption of 39 mpg combined. A few years ago you would have needed a 2.1 or 2.2 engine to get that power and not got 25 combined.
My lingering worry is how long will an engine stressed to this extent stay working ? We started off many years ago with engines that were starting to knock at 60,000 miles and engineers have gradually progressed so that 150 to 200K is not abnormal. Can we expect these new engines to be so long lasting or is the quest for economy going to be offset by the expense of engine replacements.
My lingering worry is how long will an engine stressed to this extent stay working ? We started off many years ago with engines that were starting to knock at 60,000 miles and engineers have gradually progressed so that 150 to 200K is not abnormal. Can we expect these new engines to be so long lasting or is the quest for economy going to be offset by the expense of engine replacements.
Last edited: