M113k or M157? Back to the scene

supermgm

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
East Sussex
Your Mercedes
2018 BMW M140i, 1996 TVR Chimaera 500, 1998 Honda VFR800
Hello all,

It's been about 8 years since I last interacted on this forum and also owned a Mercedes. Dreadful, I know.

Mainly because I've been using company cars and BMWs for that matter. Previously I had a C215 CL500, that was a lovely thing, but it did knock my confidence in Mercedes in general. Due to a number of rather irritating faults and failures, mostly due to previous owners or me being a student and not having a lot of money to actually fix anything properly.

A number of fast BMWs later, including an E39 M5, M140i (all of which have been unbelievably reliable) etc. I'm in the market for a new daily driver. My circumstances mean I don't typically do many miles, so a V8 daily is on the shortlist.

Now, do I go for something a little older W211 E55 or CLS 55 with the venerable M113k engine and pretty solid reliability, albeit terrible fuel consumption (max 20mpg?). Or do I go down the slightly newer M157 engine cars E63 et al. I've heard these aren't as strong as the all M113k - but are somewhat more efficient.

I'll use the cars for 90% long journeys to the airport or visiting clients etc. so want something comfy, not ruinous on fuel, V8 and reliable.

So please help me make up my mind!
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
My two 2012 E63 M157 never gave me any issues, and as long as the timing chain issue has been dealt with, they should be fine

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 
OP
supermgm

supermgm

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
East Sussex
Your Mercedes
2018 BMW M140i, 1996 TVR Chimaera 500, 1998 Honda VFR800
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
My two 2012 E63 M157 never gave me any issues, and as long as the timing chain issue has been dealt with, they should be fine

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Easily found out by looking through the oil cap - two different types I've seen?
 

DSK

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
2,843
Your Mercedes
CLS 320 CDI, S350 Bluetec
I drove a e63 with n/a when they were relatively new. Personally, I did not like the character of the engine for anything other than flat out driving. The bit where it all starts to get interesting always seems just out of reach in daily conditions unless you drive excessively fast everywhere. With all the turbo charged pocket rockets everything has buggered off. However, the sound track is probably the best and purest I’ve heard. Nothing this side of v12 hyper cars can compete.

I’d go for the torque monster 5.5 kompressor, not only is it my favourite Mercedes engine but, they are solid, have a solid gearbox (I’m far from the biggest fan of the 7g) and in E55 guise highly practical. I would then perform a rust treatment on it as the first thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
That was the nature of the M156. The M157 was a twin turbo with loads if power low down

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 

DSK

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
2,843
Your Mercedes
CLS 320 CDI, S350 Bluetec
Sorry I misread for the na for some reason…

I recall AMGeed didn’t regret going from an E55 to the E63 5.5.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
Sorry I misread for the na for some reason…

I recall AMGeed didn’t regret going from an E55 to the E63 5.5.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, he didn't after seeing mine!

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 
OP
supermgm

supermgm

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
East Sussex
Your Mercedes
2018 BMW M140i, 1996 TVR Chimaera 500, 1998 Honda VFR800
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #8
Yeah the M156 reminds me of the S85 a little - great engine for something small and lightweight. I want a more effortless driving experience, so has to be either 157 or 113k with the torque on offer.
I drove a e63 with n/a when they were relatively new. Personally, I did not like the character of the engine for anything other than flat out driving. The bit where it all starts to get interesting always seems just out of reach in daily conditions unless you drive excessively fast everywhere. With all the turbo charged pocket rockets everything has buggered off. However, the sound track is probably the best and purest I’ve heard. Nothing this side of v12 hyper cars can compete.

I’d go for the torque monster 5.5 kompressor, not only is it my favourite Mercedes engine but, they are solid, have a solid gearbox (I’m far from the biggest fan of the 7g) and in E55 guise highly practical. I would then perform a rust treatment on it as the first thing.


Sent from my iPhone using T
 

DSK

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
2,843
Your Mercedes
CLS 320 CDI, S350 Bluetec
Whilst I am an m113k fan, I can’t help but think the e63 5.5 is the better option for most.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

alexanderfoti

MBO Forum Supporter
Authorised Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
15,385
Reaction score
6,790
Location
Tonbridge
Your Mercedes
W221 S65 AMG - W204 C63 AMG + Various other MB's
I prefer the m113k

The m157 can be great and reliable and torquey, especially when tuned.

With age chain issues, adjusters and pcv systems are common. They will do far better economy on a run, being direct injected etc.

I'd choose the car first as most of the cars with 157s are 10,12 years newer than anything with the m113k
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSK
OP
supermgm

supermgm

Active Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
East Sussex
Your Mercedes
2018 BMW M140i, 1996 TVR Chimaera 500, 1998 Honda VFR800
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #11
I prefer the m113k

The m157 can be great and reliable and torquey, especially when tuned.

With age chain issues, adjusters and pcv systems are common. They will do far better economy on a run, being direct injected etc.

I'd choose the car first as most of the cars with 157s are 10,12 years newer than anything with the m113k
Would you say the whole bore-scoring and bent rod accounts are just very unlucky on the M157, or is it an inevitable?
 

alexanderfoti

MBO Forum Supporter
Authorised Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
15,385
Reaction score
6,790
Location
Tonbridge
Your Mercedes
W221 S65 AMG - W204 C63 AMG + Various other MB's
Batch of bad injectors and a load of tuners putting too much boost/ignition timing in at low rpm. It's not such a common sight now
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
I prefer the m113k

The m157 can be great and reliable and torquey, especially when tuned.

With age chain issues, adjusters and pcv systems are common. They will do far better economy on a run, being direct injected etc.

I'd choose the car first as most of the cars with 157s are 10,12 years newer than anything with the m113k
And pulley issues on M113s ?

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 

alexanderfoti

MBO Forum Supporter
Authorised Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
15,385
Reaction score
6,790
Location
Tonbridge
Your Mercedes
W221 S65 AMG - W204 C63 AMG + Various other MB's
A far far cheaper fix more equivalent to replacing idler pulleys compared to bent con rods
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
A far far cheaper fix more equivalent to replacing idler pulleys compared to bent con rods
I never had the con rod issue, but as you say, people overtuned them. Idler pulleys were a regular disposable item from my mates that had the M113 though

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 

SJMaxwell

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
646
Reaction score
152
Location
Gillingham
Your Mercedes
2016 SL63
I forgot that the M157 has the coil pack problem. Like the M156, they eat them, but dealers rarely, if ever have all 8 in stock, so you end up chasing them and replacing them as they fail!

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
 

DSK

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
2,843
Your Mercedes
CLS 320 CDI, S350 Bluetec
What about the timing chain upgrade, an oil check valve recall (on early cars) and a dodgy sensor that let oil into the wiring due to a beautifully engineered seal on the M157?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SL63 Mark

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
4,730
Reaction score
2,820
Location
The South
Your Mercedes
R231 SL63 AMG
I have owned both, and the M157 is a much better engine IMHO, especially in its later more powerful guise. Faster, more economical, better noise, more fun with the roof down. 900NM in the '63 vs 700NM in the now rather old M113k. Don't get me wrong I was impressed with the 113k when I bought one in 2012, but the M157 is much better. It's night and day, a more modern engine. Talk to people who have actually owned them long term, rather than the internet jockeys.

The M113k leaks oil, and has potentially disastrous oil pickup issues. The 157 is totally reliable, except when tuned.
 

AMGeed

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
9,301
Reaction score
7,507
Location
Poole, Dorset
Your Mercedes
1998/2001 W210 E280 x2 SOLD 2004 W211 E55 SOLD, 2014 E63 Biturbo SOLD .S204 C180K
I moved from an 04 E55 to a 64 E63 Biturbo and didn't regret it for a moment.
As good and quick as the E55 is, the E63 is much quicker. Both great cars with low down boost that I love.
I'm afraid I only had the E63 for 2 months before I took it to Acid at MSL and had a remap and exhaust work done.
That totally transformed the car again. An absolute animal up to 160 mph (private road of course)
Never had a single issue with either car, although the bent rods reports on the M157 did make me nervous.
There is also the issue of the coil packs and leaking oil into the ECU wiring harness through the cam magnets.
No issues at all as I said and the only things I've heard that could be problematic with the M113k is the possibility of an oil pump failure.

I owned the E63 for 3 years and it was running better when I sold it thanks to the remap. I'd buy another M157 without question had the M177 W213 E class not been such a big step up in the cabin. Both the W211 and W212 are showing signs of age in comparison to the later offerings from Mercedes. Not surprising really, its called progress and its what sells cars.
 

AMGeed

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
9,301
Reaction score
7,507
Location
Poole, Dorset
Your Mercedes
1998/2001 W210 E280 x2 SOLD 2004 W211 E55 SOLD, 2014 E63 Biturbo SOLD .S204 C180K
What about the timing chain upgrade, an oil check valve recall (on early cars) and a dodgy sensor that let oil into the wiring due to a beautifully engineered seal on the M157?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From 2013 on, this wasn't an issue with the M157.
Although the oil wicking up the harness can still be an issue.
 

WE HAVE NOW MOVED: 8 Hazel Road, Woolston, SO19 7GB
Service, Repairs and remapping service
Any queries, please do not hesitate to contactEmail@mbsofsouthampton.co.ukor alternatively you can phone Colin or Dave on 02380 445820, out of hours numbers are 07787913313 or 07907631681.
Top Bottom