Malcolm, I will not be drawn into a silly argument here. ZF do for benz as Bosch do, They are both OEM. You have an SL500, look at your transmission number and Im sure you will find its a ZF boxMy answer still stands eric.
It does not matter who built it, MB use their own gear boxes, I have never seen any reference to anyone wanting spare parts saying "oh yes, you can use xxx from a ZF box". Only when that day comes along can you say that is a ZF gearbox labled MB
Re BMW, Problems ? please visit any forum and it will open your eyes.
Re problems with the tranies on big or small cars.
I have never seen any more problems occuring on the AMG cars, than any other car in the range.
Malcolm, I will not be drawn into a silly argument here. ZF do for benz as Bosch do, They are both OEM. You have an SL500, look at your transmission number and Im sure you will find its a ZF box
Alvis I remember well, but the point im trying to make is that Manufacturers demands are not always what suppliers can achieve and the 722.5 box was a big bone of contention. Ive already said that ZF boxes work very well in so many cars. But if you have to cut corners to meet the customers needs, at the price they dictate, then of course problems will ensue. And this is, in no way, a bad remark on ZF. They make damed good boxes for BMW.Well I thought that for years and I got shouted down, I have thought it strange that the ZF 7 gear boxes in the BM's had the same spec as the 7g,
As I said I got shouted down on it, but it would seem odd with the biggest gearbox manufacture on their door step to do other wise.
The ZF manual gearboxes that were in the Alvis TE and F's that I had were a delight to use, and I will leave it here too eric.
Alvis I remember well, but the point im trying to make is that Manufacturers demands are not always what suppliers can achieve and the 722.5 box was a big bone of contention. Ive already said that ZF boxes work very well in so many cars. But if you have to cut corners to meet the customers needs, at the price they dictate, then of course problems will ensue. And this is, in no way, a bad remark on ZF. They make damed good boxes for BMW.
Ive tried to point out the fact that ZF make good boxes, both auto and manual. But the boxes supplied to MB were dictated by MB (pricing ect) and thats where it whent wrong. They are not at all bad but they do have their weak points.bI do not think the boxes are that bad eric, when you consider the amount of cars running around.
Yes the attempt to convert a 4 speed into a 5 was not the best of ideas, still that was not too bad
Ive tried to point out the fact that ZF make good boxes, both auto and manual. But the boxes supplied to MB were dictated by MB (pricing ect) and thats where it whent wrong. They are not at all bad but they do have their weak points.b
I'm not sure it would be cheaper for a gearbox manufacturer to start machining new parts for a gearbox they already build, in order to save money for the buyer?
shi
Just wondered what the reason for the question was.
Had my car for 4.5 years now (it's my daily driver) and I think the gearbox is hugely impressive - 4 speed auto 722.3.
Changes are fast and smooth, and kickdown good, but 1 sec delay is annoying, so have got into the habit of flicking the lever back to 3rd ready to overtake when I feel an opportunity is coming, then whooooosh and away - excellent.
The 1 sec delay seems magnified because there is nothing for the driver to do except wait for the changedown to happen. Compared to a manual car it is probably a quicker gearchange in fact, but just seems slow. In a manual car you are working on the clutch, and moving the lever, so there is plenty of physical action going on, but it probably all takes longer than 1 sec I would suggest.,
Malcom & Eric thanks,that was interesting,I live in the North Cotswolds,good shooting country as it happens,I get the feeling that the mention of shooting is going to start a whole new topic