It is a legal requirement, although as there are almost zero traffic officers around these days very unlikely to get stoppedA few weeks back, one of EmilysMum's work mates was pulled over first thing in the morning for not having cleared her windscreen enough ... despite her protest that she'd a supermarket to open up at 0600, the copper just made her clear her screen before her let her on her way. I don't know how people think it's OK to clear the minimum snow .... I try to clear all that I can, even from the roof etc
It certainly is to clear ones windscreen...but I had a disagrement with somebody recently who said you will get 3 points on your licence for not clearing the snow of your cars roof.It is a legal requirement,
..... In the overall time involved, removing the snow off the roof is normally only an extra minute or two - with a soft broom it can be mostly pushed off quickly.
There may not be a specific section defining roof clearance but if you're moving along and lots of show is blowing in a cloud behind you then you're a candidate for a ticket.
Yes as i said if an incident could be attributed to it you would be in trouble.with a soft broom it can be mostly pushed off quickly.
Section 3 RTA Driving without due care or reasonable consideration for other road users. Fits perfectly.It certainly is to clear ones windscreen...but I had a disagrement with somebody recently who said you will get 3 points on your licence for not clearing the snow of your cars roof.
I pointed out that there is no specific law against driving with snow on the roof of your vehicle, however if there was an incident which could be attributed to it then you would be in trouble.
It is common sense not to drive with a significant build up of snow on ones roof.
The photo above was taken in Dundee the other day.
Stupid Scottish drivers!
You don't need to be a traffic officer. I had several chases as a Panda driver which ended up in Crown Court Sect 2 Reckless Driving. All convicted one got 9 months inside.It is a legal requirement, although as there are almost zero traffic officers around these days very unlikely to get stopped
Again as I said if something happens that can be attributed to it, but if nothing happens then no law has been broken.Section 3 RTA Driving without due care or reasonable consideration for other road users. Fits perfectly.
I totally disagree, you don't need something to happen before you take action, all the evidence is there. In practice I would tell the driver to remove the snow, if he didn't he would be reported Sec 3.Again as I said if something happens that can be attributed to it, but if nothing happens then no law has been broken.
My original comment was stated in response to somebody who believed that simply driving with snow on the roof of ones vehicle is against the law.
There are many situations where the law is black/white so there is no doubting when it has been broken, but this is not one of them.I totally disagree, you don't need something to happen before you take action, all the evidence is there. In practice I would tell the driver to remove the snow, if he didn't he would be reported Sec 3.