c240 over a bmw 320d

eddiereilly

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
im having abit of a problem desiding what to do , change my c20 auto estate for a 320d touring msport ,
advise please the pros and cons if yous can
 

jberks

Senior Member
Joined
May 12, 2004
Messages
11,146
Reaction score
25
Location
M1, Outside lane, somewhere between Leeds and Lond
Your Mercedes
Jaguar XF 3.0 S, LR Freelander 2, Fiat 500 & Fiat Panda
Well,
The 320d will handle better, is faster and will be vastly more economical.
It will also be a worse ride and a much harsher engine (like driving a Massey Fergussen after the sweeeet 240).
Interior wise I think the 320 is a bit bland and austere but its well screwed together and a well sorted motor overall.
I take it a C220cdi isn't on the cards?
 

survey

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
768
Reaction score
22
Location
Suffolk
Your Mercedes
2012 C207 E250cdi Sport Coupe
Jberks - and if the choice is between a 320d and a C220cdi?
 

simon_wall69

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
Location
Stone, Staffordshire
Having been in both recently, I would say that both are very good cars. The BMW will be more economical, fractionally quicker and will handle better. The Merc is a nicer interior and design and much, much, much more comfortable. If you do go for the BMW, get one without the M sport gubbins as the ride is ridiculously hard - it would be impossible on long journeys.
 

type49

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
1
If you do go for the BMW, get one without the M sport gubbins as the ride is ridiculously hard - it would be impossible on long journeys.

I'd agree with that. My friend bought a 330d E46 from new & he had the M-sport suspension/wheels option. The ride is actually very good at 80MPH but dreadfull at 20-40. It just continuously jars & bounces about at "normal" speeds.:shock:
 

hawk20

Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
4,971
Reaction score
10
Your Mercedes
ML250 BlueTEC Sport
Interesting head to head, BMW versus MB estates in What Car and the C class came out best. In particular better ride and much more spacious.
 

SSR S500

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Location
London
Your Mercedes
S500/2002/V8
The 2 litre BMW diesel suffers from turbo problems, quite common for the swirl flap to be sucked into the engine causing serious problems that are expensive to put right. Cousins cost £1900 just to get it back on the road, would have cost £3k to fully repair. If you decide to go for one, check to see that it is removed or take the removal cost into account when buying
 

SSR S500

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Location
London
Your Mercedes
S500/2002/V8
BMW 2 litre diesels suffer from problems with their turbochargers, quite common for swirl flaps to get sucked into the engine, an expensive problem to put right. Cousins E46 320d 2002(52) with approx 70k had this problem and it cost £1900 to get it back on the road, however a full repair would have set him back £3k according to his mechanic. If you do decide to go for one check to see that it is removed or take into account the cost of removal when buying.
 

turbopete

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
14,209
Reaction score
329
Age
46
Location
Spennymoor
Your Mercedes
2017 '17' Ford Mondeo 2.0TDCi ST Line X 180 (sorry)
Jberks - and if the choice is between a 320d and a C220cdi?

buy the c220cdi if it comes into the equasion. performance will be similar (bmw slightly better,not worth mentioning hardly though in my experience of e class vs 5 series) bmw will certainly feel better through the bends, however the ride is better in the merc, better interior, better looking even, and only let down by the gearbox if you buy a manual merc! both very good cars, but on balance, the merc would get my money every time!

i compared my e300turbodiesel to my mates 530d bmw. performance was very similar, bmw had much harsher ride, similar fuel consumption, dull interior in the bmw etc. thing that worried me though is that his 530d was the sport model and had common rail diesel technology and wasnt notably quicker or better on fuel than my car and mines the old school diesel not a cdi!!! cdi mercs are meant to be much quicker and more economical so what if id had a 320cdi? who knows? also the bmw was much heavier on the steering! for the record his car is an 04plate which had about 87kmiles on the clock at the time, mines a 1999 reg with 136k miles at the time
 


www.W140.co.uk&www.r129.co
Specialist in parts for W140 and R129 Mercedes-Benz models.
Top Bottom