mr. serious
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all, just wanted a few 'seasoned pro's' opinions on whether or not to purchase a CLK 55 amg WITH 100+k miles with FMBSH, or pay the extra and go for the lower 'miler', say, 75k miles, again with FMBSH??
My view is that its a V8 and V8's can and will go on forever if correctly maintained, pretty much like anything mechanical really. Of course consumables and other materials will require changing due to wear and tear, but that is all part of servicing something mechanical/electrical.
However, with it being a performance car and the possibility of it being 'ragged' at every opportunity, is it likely that the higher the mileage, the greater the chances of it becoming an old knacker faster than the car with the lesser mileage, even with the servicing?
I realise I may have answered my own question with the reasoning above, but I know little about this car and its realiability and wear/tear/cost issues, so I am asking you guys if you could shed some more light on the subject for me please..?
Thanks,
Ian
My view is that its a V8 and V8's can and will go on forever if correctly maintained, pretty much like anything mechanical really. Of course consumables and other materials will require changing due to wear and tear, but that is all part of servicing something mechanical/electrical.
However, with it being a performance car and the possibility of it being 'ragged' at every opportunity, is it likely that the higher the mileage, the greater the chances of it becoming an old knacker faster than the car with the lesser mileage, even with the servicing?
I realise I may have answered my own question with the reasoning above, but I know little about this car and its realiability and wear/tear/cost issues, so I am asking you guys if you could shed some more light on the subject for me please..?
Thanks,
Ian
Last edited: