clive williams
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2005
- Messages
- 586
- Reaction score
- 0
malcolm210 said:Wow!! Blobcat/Clive.
I can't match figures like mid 40s, the best on mine for similar use is 41 ish with a very light foot (constant 70). Does this mean that things get better as the engine loosens up (presently 46K). The car has just nicely been serviced so I know that the maintenance is OK.
Hope to match your figs one day (assuming the the trip is accurate). I must check the accuracy of mine sometime with a brim to brim fill.
Malcolm,
The figures I get are given by the computer. I accept that they may not be accurate but judging by the distance/fuel gauge consumption reading then they are in the right ballpark. - The fuel gauge reading is reasonably accurate based on the amount I have to add to reach brim full each time.
The reason I can't normally check the manual figures is that the wife uses the car most times and is not methodical in recording mileage or fill amount. It is very rare that I am in control of the consecutive fills.
The other factor which may have a bearing is that it is fitted with a power box, which 'optimises' the fueling (read overfuels at points on the fuel map)
Clive
500E
E320CDIT210
Clive