cleverdicky
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- Messages
- 2,385
- Reaction score
- 2
- Your Mercedes
- MB
I would want a film crew and sound man for that sort of money ...
Not always necessary, tG. I know of a case of a motorcyclist wearing a helmetcam knocked off by a white-van driver pulling out without looking. In subsequent accident statement, van driver made up some story blaming the motorcyclist. Deadlock ... 'til the motorcyclist sent the van driver's insurers a copy of the film of the van driver admitting at the time it was his fault and apologising ...is the information gleaned from them admissible in court.
Im free!
The vision off them IS admissable in court, provided you make two copies; one for the other party.
I cannot see any problem regarding the usage of car-cam footage being used as evidence as long as it was immediately disclosed to the police that you have a video recording of the event, also, handing over the SD card to the police at the time would clear you of any accusation of tampering.
Video evidence is widely used in courts, street cctv, mobile phone footage, etc, and i dont see why car recorder footage would be treated any differently.
For those of you who wonder what the quality is like of the Android based Road Voyager free app ..here is some i recorded earlier - apologies o sound ..its my fault not the app ..
but thought some might want to see ..i put this on an old Android phone that has a dodgy screen ..seems to work ok ..tho the phone does get warm being used constantly but not dangerously so..
http://youtu.be/ZgIdO6cqBL4
[YOUTUBE]ZgIdO6cqBL4[/YOUTUBE]