psmart
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
- Messages
- 1,653
- Reaction score
- 0
In line with SlinkyJoe's and Omni's polls, it would be a useful indicator to see how reliable our Mercs really are. Ive split it into three sections:
pre 96, 96-2003 and 2004-
with three choices per section:
Reliable - only ever had normal services and wear & tear replacements.
Average - the odd small failure not related to wear & tear.
Un-reliable - serious failures, such as new gearbox, new turbo/cats etc.
Please bear in mind your cars age and judge accordingly. ie. a pre 96 doing 200,000 miles needing a new gearbox would be down to wear & tear, whereas a 2004 needing a new axle housing would be un-reliable.
pre 96, 96-2003 and 2004-
with three choices per section:
Reliable - only ever had normal services and wear & tear replacements.
Average - the odd small failure not related to wear & tear.
Un-reliable - serious failures, such as new gearbox, new turbo/cats etc.
Please bear in mind your cars age and judge accordingly. ie. a pre 96 doing 200,000 miles needing a new gearbox would be down to wear & tear, whereas a 2004 needing a new axle housing would be un-reliable.