Extended Civil Restraint Order

[robertjrt]

Never had a new battery fitted? Would have though an obvious next step. Why leave it at the dealer so long before collection? Did you not chase it after the first, certainly, second day?

My car was in the workshop to be repaired, as I though, under the terms of the warranty, if the battery was knakered it need a replacement.

Now; what do I say?

It would be circumspect for me to leave the latter question un-answered at this time.

 

[Frontstep]

Blimey £6500 what are you alledged to have done jumped it straight from the National Grid.

 

[robertjrt]

Blimey £6500 what are you alledged to have done jumped it straight from the National Grid.

It would seem so, the car was returned in an un-roadworthy condition and when when the ignition key was turned the dashboard indicated DO NOT DRIVE.

So, it would seem that the £6,640 did not ensure that the car was in "working" order.

 

[grober]

As that well known philosopher Mark Knopfler once said. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGu6JsQOFjM

Well it's a strange old game you learn it slow
One step forward and it's back you go
You're standing on the throttle
You're standing on the brake
In the groove 'til you make a mistake

Sometimes you're the windshield
Sometimes you're the bug
Sometimes it all comes together baby
Sometimes you're just a fool in love
Sometimes you're the Louisville Slugger
Sometimes you're the ball
Sometimes it all comes together
Sometimes you're gonna lose it all

 

[Frontstep]

Well I would be mightly miffed as well if a bill that size didn't get it to run.
That issue on its own calls into question the competence of the Technicians that worked on it and presumably diagnosed your "cooking attempts".
Do you have the parts still available for analysis that you alledgedly fried.

 

[robertjrt]

Well I would be mightly miffed as well if a bill that size didn't get it to run.
That issue on its own calls into question the competence of the Technicians that worked on it and presumably diagnosed your "cooking attempts".
Do you have the parts still available for analysis that you alledgedly fried.

Strangley enough;no

There is a worksheet that shows electrical work being done on the car; change 10am fuse etc., then the next day an indent for a 120amp fuse assemble and fuse.

The only thing that everybody agrees on is that the electrics were "fried" but the fact that my car had been driven into the workshop car park after starting "on it own" shows MB as liers.

I have copies of the two reports on the collection and delivery of my car from the recovery people which had been requested by Mondial before I was informed that I was expected to pay for the "damage".

Mondial, another multi-national company that prides itself on their customer care policies

 

[Frontstep]

The "frying" would have an evidence trail which may or may not have been usefull as to who did what when.
The he did it, no it was already like that argument needs solid evidence to determine where the truth lies.
Evidence of interrogation of the cars systems would have been more than usefull.
Analysis of the components would be usefull.
Judges like paper trails and expert reports.

 

[BarryF]

We have the finest legal system money can buy.
Barry

 

[robertjrt]

The "frying" would have an evidence trail which may or may not have been usefull as to who did what when.
The he did it, no it was already like that argument needs solid evidence to determine where the truth lies.
Evidence of interrogation of the cars systems would have been more than usefull.
Analysis of the components would be usefull.
Judges like paper trails and expert reports.

I have kept every single piece of paper as thay will be needed for the "storyline" in the book, a document with my forged signature, internal invoice for new tyres (not fitted) missing spare ( changed make, cover and size), warranty claim invoices, star reports: It just keeps going on and on.

As an ex-Car sales Manager I have a good idea what to look for

The Judge at the trial did ask why the technician was not present, I wondered that also

 

[Thincat]

I would hazard a guess that Mercedes-Benz are abusing the law in the dealings with their customer complaints if my experence is anything to go by.

They play hardball, without question. I've never on any occasion managed to get any goodwill payment out of them for the various manufacturing faults on my car. They also refused to replace a cat that had broken up within 2 years (after having been replaced under warranty after 18 months) because they claimed it was out of guarantee - the guarantee ended with the original car's guarantee, they said.

I don't know how much money you've lost but there comes a time to forget it and put it down to experience. Don't buy a Mercedes - they're no longer a quality product and their customer service people are liars.

 

[rovingHawk]

Mercedes-Benz will need..........take me to trial for Slander/Libal which may be a problem for them as what I have written is the truth, and I can prove it

Truth might have to be proven and is not necessarily a defence- be careful.

RH

 

[robertjrt]

.

I don't know how much money you've lost but there comes a time to forget it and put it down to experience. Don't buy a Mercedes - they're no longer a quality product and their customer service people are liars.

Lost money, I don't know, say £40,000+.

As far as forgetting it and putting it down to experence, err, no, not until Plan B has run it course and Plan C is not viable.

Its only then that I shall not be restricted what I write

 

[robertjrt]

Truth might have to be proven and is not necessarily a defence- be careful.

RH

I did not lie in the witness box, Mercedes-Benz did and is is all in the trial transcript. I would welcome the chance to have ***** in the witness box as I have a few questions that need an answer.

I was given some good advice many years ago;

Conversation can be disputed, the written word less so, especialy if it is from a legal department for and on behalf of a corporate body. (Mercedes-Benz)

 

[robertjrt]

I am confused. Was there an earlier thread which tells what this thread is about ?

Look on page 6 for the abridged version.

 

[Darrell]

What happenened next?

 

[robertjrt]

What happenened next?

Its a long story which has been posted over these past years. The Court Order does not allow me to Issue any further Claims against MB.

I have had notice from MB that they are seeking a General Restraint Order against me. GRO are granted very rarely

I am waiting for the fifth annivesary, 30 November, to see if the rabbit jumps out of the hat (plan B)

 

[robertjrt]

In this mornings post an Order from the Court;

.....It is Ordered that:

Part 2.

To the Claimant ROBERT CARLYLE: you must obey the terms of the following part of this Order. If you do not obey, you will be guilty of a contempt of court and you Robert Carlyle may be sent to prison.

1. Robert Carlyle is forbidden for a period of two years from the date of this Order (until 24th may 2012) ( whether personally or through any servent or agent) from issuing any new applications, appeal or any other proceedings in this action or in action OR from issuing any further proceedings or further applications, or process in any action concerning or touching upon proceedings in which this order in made namely the NEGLIGENT REPAIR ( my capitals) by the defendants of his Mercedes-Benz motor car and the consequences thereof.

2,3 4 relate to the procedure if I wish to appeal the Order.

So, those of you who are thinking of taking MB to court for any reason, be careful, make sure you can afford expensive legal advice and are prepared to spend years doing so.

I shall, of course, comply with the Order as I have no wish to go to prison.


It a good job I have Plan B in operation which should come to fruition soon

If Mercedes-Benz thought that I would allow them to rob me they are very mistaken.

Remember this?

 

[television]

Yes very well

 

[Daeths]

...and...?

 

[robertjrt]

...and...?

The Civil route was closed, so I went to the Police.

No joy there, so; Publicity is the next logical step.