A.J.
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 21,258
- Reaction score
- 9,581
- Location
- Norwich. UK
- Your Mercedes
- UnMerc - 2020 VW Polo 2.0t GTi Plus, DSG. Flash Red, Traditional VW GTi Tartan seat trim.
I think this is the problem for many, more than any genuine concerns for pollution, it is about which one feels quick and cheapest.
However, I don't agree with the above anymore, things have changed in the last 2-3 years.
Nearly all new petrols are forced induction these days, they no longer feel lacking in any torque.
Back in 1996 I had a choice between the A4 in 1.8i or 1.9tdi guise, they were both 90hp, both did the 'sprint' to 60mph in 11 seconds but one did 25mpg and the other 55mpg. It was a no brainer.
However, roll on a few years and the difference between my 530i and 530d was more like 28mpg and 33mpg.
Roll on a few more years and the difference between 535d and 335i was sod all.
And currently I am in a 350 cgi e class, it was the cdi before that, and the difference is around 10%, which also tells me that petrol tech has moved on at a faster rate than diesel tech.
I am sure if we didn't have to worry about emissions we would be seeing lots of 100mpg diesels, but at the moment it seems the advances in mpg are simply being wiped out by the need for emission controlling gadgets.
Then you have things like the VAG 1.4tfsi, it is lighter, smoother, revs better, sounds better and has a nice clutch attached than the 2.0tdi and yet gets exactly the same MPG, in fact during sub 10 mile journeys it is slightly more efficient than the diesel.
I am seeing less and less of a reason to buy diesels now. However, it may take a while for customers to realise this.
What you say is very true, however for me there is just something about the way a diesel drives, I like the torque without the flurry of revs for example. Mine has 400nm of torque, you wont get that out of a 1.4Tfsi I would very much doubt !!