Wheel bolts torque settings.

[television]

124, 129,168,170,171,202,203,208,209,210,240 all 110Nm

140,163,164,215,220 all 150Nm

211,230,414 all 130Nm

 

[television]

Could the above please be made sticky,thank you

 

[anyweb]

done

and for those like me that don't know how to measure torque etc, how can we go about doing this ?

 

[television]

A cheap torque wrench with a ½" drive will do the job.

If you do not have one when having tyres etc fitted, take the measurement with you for you car, and ask that they toque it by hand and not that air gun.

 

[whitenemesis]

Are those values the same for steel and alloy wheels?

 

[television]

Are those values the same for steel and alloy wheels?

Yes for all wheels

 

[brianbrian]

Any web, when you buy a new torque wrench the instructions go with it, simple to use ,I use my torque wrenches all the time stops over or under tightening. sorry to but in Malcom but your a bit slow tonight must be the old filters.

 

[television]

Any web, when you buy a new torque wrench the instructions go with it, simple to use ,I use my torque wrenches all the time stops over or under tightening. sorry to but in Malcom but your a bit slow tonight must be the old filters.

Dont know about old filters, old fitters yes

 

[Dosco]

Dont know about old filters, old fitters yes

old fitters are quick fart fitters though:lol: (should have said 'fit')

 

[philharve]

Torque settings

Hi All

What happened to 'lb-ft' then?

REGARDS

Phil

 

[Cole@MBS]

Hi All

What happened to 'lb-ft' then?

REGARDS

Phil

Dont go there,

Working with Dave, he use lb-ft!

I was only ever taught using nt metres

 

[Dosco]

Hi All

What happened to 'lb-ft' then?

REGARDS

Phil

Showing your age now Phil:lol:

 

[Alex M Grieve]

Working with Dave, he use lb-ft!

I was only ever taught using nt metres

Tried it once, couldn't calibrate the Newton meter!

 

[television]

Hi All

What happened to 'lb-ft' then?

REGARDS

Phil

It's to make us buy new tools I must say that I do not miss the imperial system, where we had things like 17/64"ths,it was not too bad when you were working with it, as one normally used and worked in thou's. back then we had threads for all jobs.
BA was used for electrics with sizes from 0BA down to 9BA.
BSP were for gas pipes, BSF were used in the car trade until the 60's along with whitworth, then the AF threads and unified took over.
With the metric system there are 2 thread pitches just like using the BSF (fine) or whitworth (coarse) depending upon the application and the type of metal.

 

[philharve]

Ageism?

Showing your age now Phil:lol:

Hi Dosco

Nothing wrong in being a member of the older generation! Ask Malcolm, he's older still.

REGARDS

Phil

 

[television]

Hi Dosco

Nothing wrong in being a member of the older generation! Ask Malcolm, he's older still.

REGARDS

Phil

I need to empty out the useless info in my head, that will never be used again, that has been dormant for 40 years or more.

I cant do much about being the oldest member, but that can only last so long

 

[Alex M Grieve]

It's to make us buy new tools I must say that I do not miss the imperial system, where we had things like 17/64"ths,it was not too bad when you were working with it, as one normally used and worked in thou's. back then we had threads for all jobs.
BA was used for electrics with sizes from 0BA down to 9BA.
BSP were for gas pipes, BSF were used in the car trade until the 60's along with whitworth, then the AF threads and unified took over.
With the metric system there are 2 thread pitches just like using the BSF (fine) or whitworth (coarse) depending upon the application and the type of metal.

We must "tap" your recollections more often Malcolm! But perhaps not on this thread?

 

[television]

We must "tap" your recollections more often Malcolm! But perhaps not on this thread?

I know, a nut case at that, I will leave the pitch

 

[philharve]

Torque conversion table

Hi All

Back to the topic of this thread ...

TORQUE CONVERSION TABLE

From > To > Mult by

lb-in > oz-in > 16
lb-in > lb-ft > 0.08333
lb-in > kg-cm > 1.1519
lb-in > kg-m > 0.011519
lb-in > N-m > 0.113
lb-in > dN-m > 1.13
lb-ft > kg-m > 0.1382
lb-ft > N-m > 1.356
N-m > dN-m > 10
N-m > kg-cm > 10.2
N-m > kg-m > 0.102
oz-in > lb-in > 0.0625
lb-ft > lb-in > 12
kg-cm > lb-in > 0.8681
kg-m > lb-in > 86.81
N-m > lb-in > 8.85
dN-m > lb-in > 0.885
kg-m > lb-ft > 7.236
N-m > lb-ft > 0.7376
dN-m > N-m > 0.10
kg-cm > N-m > 0.09807
kg-m > N-m > 9.807

REGARDS

Phil

 

[television]

Hi All

Back to the topic of this thread ...

TORQUE CONVERSION TABLE

From > To > Mult by

lb-in > oz-in > 16
lb-in > lb-ft > 0.08333
lb-in > kg-cm > 1.1519
lb-in > kg-m > 0.011519
lb-in > N-m > 0.113
lb-in > dN-m > 1.13
lb-ft > kg-m > 0.1382
lb-ft > N-m > 1.356
N-m > dN-m > 10
N-m > kg-cm > 10.2
N-m > kg-m > 0.102
oz-in > lb-in > 0.0625
lb-ft > lb-in > 12
kg-cm > lb-in > 0.8681
kg-m > lb-in > 86.81
N-m > lb-in > 8.85
dN-m > lb-in > 0.885
kg-m > lb-ft > 7.236
N-m > lb-ft > 0.7376
dN-m > N-m > 0.10
kg-cm > N-m > 0.09807
kg-m > N-m > 9.807

REGARDS

Phil

Thanks Phil,,I have learn't it all, its in my head for life now