Gridlock
Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2009
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Herts
- Your Mercedes
- 1998 Azurite Blue C43 AMG
What do people know about the "good will" process, specifically relating to the recycled East German tin fences Mercedes used to make my car and hence the disgusting rust appearing in the wheel arches?
Mercedes Watford told me they won't consider it unless I've owned the car 6 months, but by then (5 months from now) it'll be terrible.
I want to get this fixed, and I'd have thought Merc wouldn't want a flagship £52,000 11-year old AMG driving around looking immaculate other than the obvious manufacturing defects but what I'm really keen to find out is why they even said they consider these under goodwill unless there's a tacit acknowledgement in place that they made low-quality bodywork (have you seen some of the 2000MY E classes? ), and if this is the case then why do I have to have owned the car for 6 months?!
Previous car was a 20 year old Audi Quattro with no rust anywhere. My weekend car is a 1990 Golf (supercharged VR6).. with no rust anywhere.
Car has a full Merc service history up until 10K miles ago (previous owner), was originally a Merc demonstrator and has had no expense spared, but I don't see why i should shell out on a bodyshop when the only reason Mercedes won't consider it is some arbitrary 6 month rule. Not trying to use the "angry potential customer" route but I was planning on maintaining this car via the main dealer, now I'm tempted to just sell the rusty POS and get a car from a manufacturer who didn't melt down baked bean cans to save a few pfennigs.
:-(
Mercedes Watford told me they won't consider it unless I've owned the car 6 months, but by then (5 months from now) it'll be terrible.
I want to get this fixed, and I'd have thought Merc wouldn't want a flagship £52,000 11-year old AMG driving around looking immaculate other than the obvious manufacturing defects but what I'm really keen to find out is why they even said they consider these under goodwill unless there's a tacit acknowledgement in place that they made low-quality bodywork (have you seen some of the 2000MY E classes? ), and if this is the case then why do I have to have owned the car for 6 months?!
Previous car was a 20 year old Audi Quattro with no rust anywhere. My weekend car is a 1990 Golf (supercharged VR6).. with no rust anywhere.
Car has a full Merc service history up until 10K miles ago (previous owner), was originally a Merc demonstrator and has had no expense spared, but I don't see why i should shell out on a bodyshop when the only reason Mercedes won't consider it is some arbitrary 6 month rule. Not trying to use the "angry potential customer" route but I was planning on maintaining this car via the main dealer, now I'm tempted to just sell the rusty POS and get a car from a manufacturer who didn't melt down baked bean cans to save a few pfennigs.
:-(
Last edited: